SPEECH BY THE HON EDWARD FENECH-ADAMI, PRIME
MINISTER, ENTITLED "L’ EUROPA NEL PENSIERO E NELL’ OPERA DI
GIOVANNI PAOLO II" ON THE OCCASION OF THE THIRD INTERNATIONAL
FORUM FONDAZIONE ALCIDE DE GASPERI – ROME, ITALY – FRIDAY, 22ND
FEBRUARY 2002
I am very grateful to Senator Bernassola and the Fondazione Alcide de
Gasperi for their kind invitation to me to speak, on behalf of the
Maltese people, at this inaugural session. In fact, His Holiness the
Pope has twice addressed brief but significant words to the Maltese
people with regard to Europe which it is now my privilege to bring to
your attention.
The first message centres on that which the Maltese
people have in common with all other European believers and in its
regard I will only highlight our understanding of it. The second centres
rather on a peculiarity of the Maltese situation and I will begin with
it.
On the 9th May last year, the Pope at the
airport spoke his farewell words to the people of Malta, the last stage
of his Jubilee Pilgrimage in the footsteps of St Paul. His Holiness
said: "Malta is at the centre of the Mediterranean. You therefore
have a unique vocation to be builders of bridges between the peoples of
the Mediterranean basin, between Africa and Europe."
Here Pope John Paul was harping on the key motif of
St Paul – the recognition of the human dignity of "the
other" as a criterion of the genuineness of one’s own Christian
identity. Europe can be faithful to its true self, the Pope implied, not
by purging itself of its outside connections in order to attain some
kind of fictitious purity, but rather by engaging in serious dialogue
and exchange with those who appear to be positioned on the other side of
the divide. In this context, Pope John Paul spoke of Malta’s location
in what he called, in quotes, ‘the geography of salvation.’ He was
recalling, at the end of his visit, some of the first words he had
pronounced on his arrival at the same airport: "Marked by its
position in Europe and in the Mediterranean, Malta is heir to a
singularly rich tradition, the heart of which is the humanism of the
Gospel…. This is the wisdom and insight which Malta can offer to the
new historical era that is slowly but surely emerging."
For those of us who clearly recalled the Pontiff’s
words on his previous visit ten years before, the phrase "new
historical era" evoked first of all Europe. The Pontiff, after
alluding to Malta’ fidelity in the past, had gone on to say: "In
our own days, as Europe prepares to enter a new period of its history, a
period filled with fresh hopes and challenges, Malta is called to
contribute to the spiritual unity of the Old Continent by offering her
treasures of Christian faith and values. Europe needs Malta’s faithful
witness too."
That small particle at the end – "too",
that is "also" – indicates that the demand being made of
Malta here is like that made to all other faithful Europeans. Hence our
attention was led to focus on the question: what is it exactly to which
we were being asked to contribute. The Pope’s phrase was: the
"spiritual unity" of Europe.
In the context of the pluralist Europe we now live
in, what can this "spiritual unity" be? I think it emerged
clearly enough from the rest of the Pope’s words to us that it was
constituted by adherence to the paradoxical concept of the human person
as both an individual and a species being. This concept was clearly
manifested in Jesus Christ and it remained at the roots even of the
secular humanism of the Enlightenment.
Indeed even self-declared anti-humanists can hardly
expunge it from their thoughts; it can only at most be relegated to the
position of a necessary point of reference for their negations. This
concept of the human being as both ego and socius emerges as the central
core of the Biblical narrative of the beginning, dramatic evolution and
eschatological destiny of humankind.
This narrative, is a necessary backcloth for the
understanding of European history and of the persistence of European
identity, although the Narrative must be allowed according to its own
rationale, to be the object of conflicting interpretations, of assent or
dissent, of belief or doubt. Without such a shared background as a
framework for dialogue, if there were only incommensurable perspectives
and unrelated value preferences, then clearly no European identity or
unity would be possible.